When Narration Earns Its Place, and When It Does Not
Audio is not a quality upgrade you apply to a whole course. It is a channel, and like every channel it suits some content and gets in the way of the rest. The useful question is not whether your course should have narration, it is which slides should.
Narration earns its place when the content needs explaining rather than listing. A procedure with a reason behind it, a figure that only makes sense in context, a policy whose tone matters as much as its wording: these are the screens where a voice working at conversational pace outperforms the same words set as text. It earns its place again when the learner's hands or eyes are busy, which is the reason audio suits anyone training on a phone between other tasks. QuikAuthor uses True Adaptive Design, so a lesson fills the screen it is on rather than shrinking to fit it, and there are native iOS and Android learner apps with push notifications and offline access.
It does not earn its place on reference content. A table of limits, a list of contacts, a set of thresholds people will come back to and scan: nobody wants to hear those, and nobody can scan audio. It does not earn its place on a knowledge check either, where the learner is thinking rather than receiving, and a voice talking over that is an interruption. And it does not earn its place as a substitute for editing. A confusing slide read aloud is a confusing slide with a soundtrack.
The practical pattern that follows is a narrated course rather than an audiobook. Voice the explanations, leave the reference screens silent, and keep the interactions quiet so the learner can concentrate. Our guide to rapid authoring covers the same trade in the wider build, including which parts of a course are worth the extra production time at all.